Wednesday, November 27, 2019

‘Trumpocrat’ Dems Plan to Support President Trump Again in 2020





A poll from the NY Times shows that most of the Dems who voted for President Trump in 2016 yet supported their party within the mid-term elections, are set to return to President Trump in 2020.

The Siena College/NY Times Upshot poll questioned a narrow part of Dems who supported President Trump in 2016 in swing states and they plan on voting for him again — though a few supported Dems in the mid-terms.

Nearly 2/3 of voters within 6 battleground states who supported the president in the year 2016 — yet voted for Dem congressional candidates in the year 2018 — state they intend to back him again in the year 2020, according to the New York Times.

The New York Times wrote:

Most of the white working-class voters within the Rust Belt who supported Trump in 2016 were traditionally Dem voters who backed Obama in 2012 and even proceeded to vote Dem down-ballot in the year 2016. Dems usually held on to those voters in 2018, yet the reasons most of them voted for Trump, like his promises on the economy or immigration, still could be relevant.

The New York Times cited many Dem voters within their story who voiced their support for the president’s policies, despite their critical viewpoints about his character.

According to the poll, in addition, Trump is winning a small part of previous Hillary Clinton voters.

According to the swing state survey, 7% of voters who supported Hillary Clinton for president in the year 2016 currently approve of the Trump’s performance in office.

The New York Times polled 3,766 voters from Florida, Arizona, North Carolina, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, in October.


Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MrSuperTrump1



Monday, November 25, 2019

Over 30% of Black Likely Voters Approve of Trump




A recent Rasmussen poll showed black likely voter Trump approval at 34%. Another Emerson Poll showed 34.5% approval by that same demographic.

Trump supporter Deneen Borelli called these results a “Democrats worst nightmare.”

Trump’s campaign celebrated this news.

According to Erin Perrine, Principal Deputy Communications Director of the Trump campaign, it may surprise Dems that support for Trump is increasing with Blacks, but it should not. Black Americans are more prosperous now than ever before because of Trump with rising paychecks and record-low unemployment.

According to Trump, in 2020, he will campaign for every last African American vote.

Perrine added that the Black Voices for Trump coalition is going to help get the truth and facts out there concerning the strength of America for Blacks underneath Trump.

Rasmussen defended these figures and noted their polling of likely voters was a lot more expensive yet more reflective of election day outcomes.

In addition, Emerson College’s assistant professor, Spencer Kimball defended their polling results with the Epoch Times.

According to Kimball, it might be attributed to variance inside the subsets … and be an anomaly, or it might be the beginning of a trend. He noted that Trump was experiencing ‘somewhat higher’ approval ratings with minorities. Kimball adds that Trump may do better with this vote than in 2016.

Between November 17 – 20, the Emerson poll was performed and featured 1,092 registered voters. The black voter margin of error is at 8.3%. Additional polls show a lower figure among registered voters.

A Morning Consult/Politico poll in November reported just 18% of black voters approved of Trump’s performance.


Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MrSuperTrump1

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Who Is Tired of Being Bullied by The LGBT Community?




Chick-fil-A reportedly will cease in donating funds to charities, which includes the Fellowship of Christian Athletes and the Salvation Army after pressure from LGBT community.

Chick-fil-A announced recently that it’s re-concentrating its charitable foundation to a smaller quantity of charities, exclusively focusing on hunger, homelessness, and education.

Chick-fil-A’s tax records exhibit that it gave to multiple Christian charitable groups and schools in 2018. None of these communities appears in a list of the company’s 2019 charitable giving that they made available to the public.

According to Tassopoulos, the company wants to be “clear about who they are” as they enter new markets.

He adds that there isn’t any question that they know that, as they enter new markets, they must be clear about who they are. There are a lot of newscasts and articles regarding Chick-fil-A, and they thought they had to be clear about their message.

As a result, Chick-fil-A will no longer give funds to organizations, which includes the Paul Anderson Youth Home, the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and the Salvation Army.

These charities have caused the LGBT community to target the company due to their position on homosexuality.

Chick-fil-A, in 2018, gave $115,000 to the Salvation Army for their Angel Tree program that offered gifts for 11,000 kids during the holidays. Also, the fast-food chain gave $1.65M to the Fellowship of Christian Athletes to give underserved youngsters week-long summer sports camps at HCBU (historically black colleges & universities).

Progressive Silicon Valley giant, in August, followed the fast-food chain’s lead, and gave $1.5M to the Salvation Army to battle homelessness.

Chick-fil-A faced increasing criticism from the LGBT community as it seeks to grow its corporate footprint. Recently, the Atlanta-based organization announced the closure of its 1st restaurant in Great Britain just one week after it opened because of protests from the LGBT community. Airports in Buffalo, NY, and San Antonio, TX, banned Chick-fil-A fast-food restaurants in the face of likewise pressure.

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MrSuperTrump1



Monday, November 18, 2019

Sessions Calls on Nancy Pelosi to Bring Inquiry on Impeachment to Conclusion




In a recent “Fox & Friends” interview former United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions called on Pelosi to bring her impeachment inquiry to a “conclusion.”

Jeff Sessions, candidate for his old United States Senate seat in Alabama, stated the impeachment probe “isn’t well-founded,” adding the House Speaker is “wrong” to threaten Trump if he criticizes the whistleblower’s identity staying a secret.

According to Sessions, he thinks Pelosi must bring this inquiry to a conclusion. It isn’t  well-founded to start with, yet just to pick fights with Trump and attempt to make those type of threats he thinks is wrong at this time.

The previous attorney general added that it’s “unthinkable” that the whistleblower’s name stays a secret if that individual is a witness.

Session adds that of course that individual ultimately would need to be made public and requesting that isn’t harassment.

Sessions concluded that he truly believes it isn’t close to impeachment, it isn’t the proper way to move forward with this … yet to convert a regular political disagreement to an impeachment matter is actually a harmful thing.


Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MrSuperTrump1



Wednesday, November 13, 2019

DACA Protesters Make Promises to Remain in The U.S. Irrespective of Court Decision




Recently, protesters collected at the U.S. Supreme Court as oral arguments were going on within the chamber about the fate of DACA (Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals). They promised to remain in the U.S. no matter what the court determines next summer.

National Immigration Law Center’s executive director, Marielena Hincapie, told protesters that they shouldn’t have to leave because of the high court’s ruling.

Hincapie says, “You belong here.”

The crowd chanted, “Home is here!”

She said her left-wing company would fight for the “Dreamers” on a daily basis and predicted the high court would make a ruling in their favor.

Ted Olson, who served as Bush’s Solicitor General, was within the Supreme Court to argue that Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals is a “legitimate, lawful” and “constitutional” plan that Janet Napolitano “signed into law.”

In fact, DACA was put into place through Barrack Obama’s exec action and implemented by DHS.

Ted stated that he “deeply” cared for recipients of DACA and was “honored” to represent recipients before the high court.

Ted added that he wanted people in America to see the faces of protesters, so they’d know how critical immigrants are to society in America.

Greisa Martinez Rosas, who’s United We Dream’s deputy executive director, an organization founded, as well as populated with young people illegally in the country, addressed these protesters who held signs reading, “Stop the Wall,” and “No human is illegal.”

“Thousands of undocumented youth and allies today are walking out to defend #DACA,” M. Rosas tweeted with hashtags SCOTUS #HomeIsHere #Heretostay

Martinez Rosas said, ‘I am unafraid and undocumented,’ and ‘I am queer and not ashamed.’

Rosas, like other speakers, said she is inside the U.S. for good.

 Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SuperTrump/


Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MrSuperTrump1


Sunday, November 10, 2019

Which Presidential Candidates Qualified for November’s Debate?




There still is time left to make the stage, yet thus far ten candidates seem to be set for Georgia’s face off.

The bar to be eligible for November’s debate, established by the DNC, is the highest yet.

About 10 candidates thus far seem to be eligible for the following November debate, hosted by The Washington Post and MSNBC in Georgia.

Presidential candidates still have some time to be eligible before the November 20th faceoff, yet the ones expected to qualify include:

·       Tulsi Gabbard
·       Tom Steyer
·       Andrew Yang
·       Cory Booker
·       Pete Buttigieg
·       Amy Klobuchar
·       Kamala Harris
·       Bernie Sanders
·       Elizabeth Warren
·       Joe Biden

That only leaves one active presidential candidate who was on stage during the debate in October, yet who’s at risk of not getting welcomed back next month: previous Housing Sec. Julián Castro.

The bar to be eligible for the debate in November, set by the DNC, is the highest yet.

Candidates must show strength in grassroots fundraising, as well as within the polls, which they may either do by reaching 3% in 4 state or national polls, or by reaching 5% in 2 polls of the early states: South Carolina, Nevada, New Hampshire, and Iowa.

The number isn’t official until the Democratic National Committee certifies the field, and donor totals are based upon candidates' public, self-reporting.



Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MrSuperTrump1

Wednesday, November 6, 2019

Appeals Court Rules President Trump to Provide 8 Years of Returns




Recently, a federal appeals court ruled Trump provide 8 years of tax returns, corporate and personal, to a state grand jury as a part of a continuous criminal probe.

Manhattan D.A. Cyrus R. Vance Jr. subpoenaed President Trump’s accounting company Mazars USA for 8 years of corporate and personal returns. The company acknowledged it’d ‘respect the legal process and completely comply with its legal obligations.’

Trump’s attorneys, in September, filed a suit to combat Cyrus R. Vance’s attempts, and cited ‘substantial constitutional issues.’

Cyrus R. Vance’s office issued a subpoena to Trump’s Organization as a part of an investigation within the $130,000 “hush-money” payment previous Trump attorney M. Cohen made to porn actress Stormy Daniels, who claimed to have had an affair with Trump — a claim the president has denied repeatedly.

According to Trump’s lawyer Jay Sekulow, in response to subpoenas that were issued by the NY County D.A., they’ve filed a suit in Federal Court on behalf of Trump to address the substantial constitutional factors at stake in this court case.

But, a 3-judge panel in NY recently rejected the president’s argument that he’s immune as president from criminal investigation when inside the White House and ruled the company has to provide 8 years of returns to the state grand jury.

The panel of judges upon the United States Second Circuit of Appeals made a prediction that the president’s attorneys are pretty sure to appeal the ruling to the United States Supreme Court. If the president stands down from this legal battle, Mazars will need to provide the documents that are sought by the NY District Attorney.

Jay responded to the ruling and stated that Trump’s team is going to be taking the court case all the way to the Supreme Court.



Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MrSuperTrump1

Sunday, November 3, 2019

Why Did Beto’s Campaign Fail?




Beto played games in the past with the media, yet he got the last chuckle of sorts by dropping out of the race, sending writers into a panic directly before the weekend. And even though the candidacy once had a lot promise, Beto’s exit from the presidential race boiled down to his reduced fundraising numbers and weak poll numbers, as well as the truth that he might never have had the support base he required to really compete for the Dem. nomination.

Also, his decline in the polls was accompanied by difficulties raising funds. In 2018, having been a fundraiser, Beto seemed able to attract the resources to operate a top-level presidential campaign, and showed promise by raising over $6M within the initial twenty-four hours of the campaign, the 2nd best opening day only after former VP Joe Biden. However, fundraising dollars began to dry up briefly thereafter. He’d raised just $13M by the 2nd quarter’s end, and only added another over $4M in the 3rd quarter.

Beto’s debate performances did not help him recover; as a matter of fact, his latest performance hurt him. After October’s debate, his net favorability among Dem. primary voters dipped by around six points in a post-debate Ipsos poll, the largest dip for any of the twelve presidential candidates on stage. Beto’s place at further debates was also in severe jeopardy. O’Rourke was 2 polls shy of making the Nov. debate and had yet to register one survey for the Dec. debate.

However, O’Rourke may always have had problems attracting a big enough support base within the primary given the composition of the Dem. electorate. As a moderate 3-term congressman, Beto won over several suburban Caucasian voters within his TX Senate bid, yet as Nate Silver wrote back last July, a Caucasian moderate base, especially younger ones, was not enough.


Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MrSuperTrump1

Friday, November 1, 2019

Trump on His Impeachment: Bill Clinton Was Guilty, I’m Not




Recently, President Trump dismissed the concept that he deserved impeachment, and claimed that he didn’t commit an impeachable act unlike previous presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.

According to Trump, everybody knows he did nothing wrong. Nixon did things wrong; Clinton did things wrong. He will not go back to Johnson because that was a bit before his time. He adds that they did things wrong. He did nothing wrong.

Recently, Trump made his statements in a Washington Examiner interview.

Trump said Bill Clinton was different. Bill was guilty. ‘This is a simpler case than Bill’s.’

Dems believe the president withheld military assistance to Ukraine to pressure leaders to investigate VP Joe Biden and son Hunter, which was an impeachable defense.

However, the president stated that he had an obligation to assess corruption inside Ukraine before he gave them military and financial aid.

He said, he is giving them money, he is giving them weapons. He said he has an obligation to look at corruption.

The president suggested that Dems were out of line with the public mood and were overstepping their authority.

Trump repeats that he did nothing wrong, and for Democrats to do this is disgraceful. To him the term impeachment is an extremely ugly word.

He said impeachment would just rally his political base.

Trump adds that it has energized his base like he has never seen before.


Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MrSuperTrump1