According to the Supreme Court, it’s permitting parts
of Trump's travel ban to take effect and that it’ll hear arguments within the
case in the month of October.
This announcement comes on the final day of the Supreme
court's term before summertime recess.
In permitting parts of President Trump's executive
order to go into effect, the court narrowed the injunctions scope which lower
courts place on the temporary travel ban.
The court is permitting implementation of a temporary
ban on entry to the United States of citizens of 6 Muslim-majority nations;
however, with the exception for those who have what the Supreme Court referred
to as ‘any bona fide relationship with an entity or person in the U.S.’
This includes foreign nationals who have familial
connections within the United States, students who’ve already been admitted to
a university in America, and workers who have existing job offers within the
United States.
For individuals from the 6 countries with "bona
fide" connections, injunctions that were put in place by lower courts are
upheld. Those individuals won’t be banned underneath the executive order from
coming to the United States.
However, anyone else from the 6 listed countries -- Yemen,
Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Iran -- who don’t have these types of connections
to the United States are going to be subject to this temporary travel ban.
With today's Supreme Court order, this travel ban is
predicted to take effect within 72 hours in accordance with a White House memo
that stated that this type of delay would ‘ensure a proper and orderly
implementation.’
Following 72 hours, the ninety-day ban for foreign
nationals from those 6 countries who don’t have bona fide connections to
America and 120-day ban for refugees who don’t have such ties will begin.
What’s your opinion of this? Let us know! We’d love to
hear from you!
No comments:
Post a Comment